Navigating the Storm: Leading TeamsThrough Change in UK HigherEducation


In today’s rapidly evolving landscape of UK higher education, change isn’t merely an
occasional disruption—it has become the constant backdrop against which
universities must operate. With widespread redundancies, stringent cost-saving
measures, and shifting educational paradigms, leaders in this sector face the
formidable challenge of guiding their teams through uncertain waters while
maintaining institutional excellence and staff wellbeing.


Understanding the Current Context
The UK higher education sector finds itself at a critical juncture. Financial pressures,
changing student expectations, technological disruption, and policy shifts have
created a perfect storm of uncertainty. Many institutions are implementing significant
restructuring, with redundancies becoming increasingly common. Against this
backdrop, effective leadership isn’t just desirable—it’s essential for institutional
survival and continued success.


The Human Element of Change
When managing teams through periods of transformation, recognising the profound
human impact of change is paramount. Research consistently shows that uncertainty
triggers stress responses, decreased productivity, and diminished engagement. For
university staff—many of whom have dedicated decades to academic careers—the
emotional toll can be particularly severe, affecting not only individual wellbeing but
also team dynamics and organisational culture.


Building Psychological Safety
Creating environments where team members feel psychologically safe becomes
even more crucial during turbulent times. In practical terms, this means establishing
spaces where staff can voice concerns without fear of negative consequences.
Leaders in higher education institutions should actively encourage open dialogue,
acknowledge the emotional aspects of change, and demonstrate genuine empathy
toward team members’ experiences.


Amy Edmondson’s research on psychological safety provides a valuable framework
here: teams that can speak honestly about challenges are better equipped to
navigate them successfully. For university departments facing restructuring, this
might mean regular, transparent forums where concerns can be aired and
collaboratively addressed.


Transparent Communication

During uncertainty, clear communication becomes the cornerstone of effective
leadership. University leaders must balance honesty about challenges with a
compelling vision for the future. This includes:

  •  Regular updates on organisational changes and their rationales
  •  Clear explanations of how decisions align with institutional values and mission
  •  Accessible channels for two-way communication
  •  Acknowledgement of unknowns rather than false certainty


When staff understand the ‘why’ behind difficult decisions, even uncomfortable
changes become more manageable. For example, explaining how departmental
restructuring relates to shifting student needs or financial sustainability can help
contextualise otherwise painful transitions.


Empowering Through Autonomy


Research by Deci and Ryan on self-determination theory suggests that maintaining
autonomy is critical for motivation during change. Within the hierarchical structures of
many universities, finding ways to preserve staff agency becomes a leadership
imperative. This might include:

  •  Involving team members in implementation planning where possible
  •  Creating opportunities for staff to shape new processes or structures
  •  Maintaining decision-making authority within teams where appropriate
  •  Recognising and utilising staff expertise in change management


By preserving zones of autonomy, leaders help maintain team members’ sense of
professional identity—particularly important in academic environments where
professional autonomy has traditionally been highly valued.


Building Resilience
Resilient teams adapt more effectively to change. For university leaders, fostering
resilience means providing both practical and emotional resources to support staff
through transitions. This might include:

  •  Skills development for new roles or responsibilities
  •  Coaching support during transitions
  •  Recognition of small wins and progress
  •  Creating spaces for reflection and learning
  •  Maintaining focus on core academic values even as structures change


When team members feel equipped to meet new challenges, their confidence in
navigating change increases substantially.


The Role of Values-Based Leadership

In times of uncertainty, institutional values provide essential anchors. Effective
university leaders consistently refer back to core educational values and mission,
demonstrating how necessary changes serve rather than undermine these
fundamental principles. When staff see that institutional integrity remains
intact—even as structures evolve—trust in leadership decisions strengthens.


Looking Forward
As the UK higher education landscape continues to evolve, the need for skilled
change leadership will only grow. The institutions that thrive will be those whose
leaders can balance necessary transformation with compassionate people
management, creating environments where innovation flourishes alongside
wellbeing.


For those leading teams through this challenging terrain, the goal isn’t to eliminate
the discomfort of change but to create conditions where teams can adapt, learn, and
even thrive amid uncertainty. By focusing on psychological safety, transparent
communication, appropriate autonomy, resilience-building, and values-based
decision-making, leaders can guide their teams through the storm toward renewed
purpose and sustainable success.


The path forward for UK higher education will undoubtedly include further change,
but with thoughtful leadership, these changes can ultimately strengthen rather than
diminish the sector’s vital contribution to society.


Jack Orchard
Agar Management Consultancy
References

·  Edmondson, A. (1999). “Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.

·  Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). “The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior.” Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.

Share this article

Ready to get started?

If you’ve worked with us before or are seeking to understand how we could help you then simply contact us and we can start the process.